Bull details |
|
| Basic information | |||
| Name |
|
||
| ARMANDO MOF ET | |||
| Breed | Ear-tag No. | ||
| Belgian Blue | 768767021 CZ | ||
| State register | Herd-Book No. | ||
| ZBM 354 | 396000768767021 | ||
| Country of origin | Birth date | ||
| Czechia | 31.10.2014 | ||
| DNA | Blood | ||
| DNA 1503806 | |||
| Breeder | Owner |
| Montážně obchodní firma s.r.o.,B.Mlýn | CRV Czech Republic,spol.s r.o. |
| Statut | |
| bull not alive | |
| Performance data | |||||
| Birth weight (kg) | Weight at age of 120 days (kg) | Weight at age of 210 days (kg) | Weight at age of 365 days (kg) | Weight - date of selection (kg) | |
| 56 | 162 | 283 | 448 | 573 | |
| Daily weight gain at test period (g) | Daily weight gain at test period (EBV) | Daily weight gain since birth (g) | Height at rump at age of 365 days (cm) | Height at rump - date of selection (cm) | |
| 1466 | 97 | 1162 | 121 | 130 | |
| Test station: | OPB Osík | Date of selection: | 15.02.2016 | ||
| Linear scoring | ||||||||||
| Conformation | Body capacity | Muscularity | Breeding type | Total | ||||||
| HG | LB | WT | WCH | DCH | LP | MS | MT | MR | ||
| 8 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 69 |
| Relative breeding value: 103 | Relative breeding value: 110 | Relative breeding value: 109 | Relative breeding value: 110 | |||||||
Explanations:
HG - height, LB - length of body, WT - weight, WCH - width of chest, DCH - depth of chest, LP - lenght of pelvis, MS - muscle of shoulder, MT - muscle of top line, MR - muscle of rump
Graphs explanations:
HG - height, LB - length of body, WT - weight, CO - conformation, BC - body capacity, MU - muscularity, BC - breeding type
HG - height, LB - length of body, WT - weight, WCH - width of chest, DCH - depth of chest, LP - lenght of pelvis, MS - muscle of shoulder, MT - muscle of top line, MR - muscle of rump
Graphs explanations:
HG - height, LB - length of body, WT - weight, CO - conformation, BC - body capacity, MU - muscularity, BC - breeding type
Linear scoring - EBV
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
97
HG
105
LB
106
WT
103
CO
110
BC
109
MU
110
BT
| Breeding values | |||||
| Direct effect accuracy | Maternal effect accuracy | Calculation date: | 31.03.2024 | ||
| Calves: | 0 | ||||
| Calving ease | Growth | Calving ease | Growth | Herds: | 0 |
| 83/48 | 98/62 | 119/27 | 118/28 | Calves weighted: | 0 |
| Calved daughters: | 0 | ||||
Direct effect - EBV
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
81
Calv. ease
84
Birth weight
83
SI CAE
97
120 days
98
210 days
99
365 days
98
SI GR
Direct/Maternal effect explanation:
SI CAE - Selection Index - calving traits; SI GR - Selection Index - growth SI CAE definition: (relEBV CAE + relEBV BWT) / 2 SI GR definition: (relEBV 120 + relEBV 210 + relEBV 365) / 3
SI CAE - Selection Index - calving traits; SI GR - Selection Index - growth SI CAE definition: (relEBV CAE + relEBV BWT) / 2 SI GR definition: (relEBV 120 + relEBV 210 + relEBV 365) / 3
Maternal effect - EBV
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
111
Calv. ease
126
Birth weight
119
SI CAE
117
120 days
118
210 days
118
365 days
118
SI GR
Population average comparison :
| ZBM 354 | Average | Difference | |
| Direct effect - calving ease | 83 | 109 | -26 |
| Direct effect - growth | 98 | 102 | -4 |
| Maternal effect - calving ease | 119 | 115 | +4 |
| Maternal effect - growth | 118 | 124 | -6 |
| Pedigree |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you are not familiar with Czech selection/performance system, we recommend to read Selection system article first.
Detailed information of Czech methodology can be downloaded in here. Data of owners are taken from the central evidence of CMSCH, a.s. This is therefore the name of the holding to which the bull was moved within the central evidence. |