Bull details |
|
| Basic information | |||
| Name |
|
||
| LUIS | |||
| Breed | Ear-tag No. | ||
| Belgian Blue | 25289052 CZ | ||
| State register | Herd-Book No. | ||
| ZBM 218 | 362052025289 | ||
| Country of origin | Birth date | ||
| Czechia | 01.05.2003 | ||
| DNA | Blood | ||
| DNA 302480 | |||
| Breeder | Owner |
| Martinec St.,Teplice n/M. | |
| Statut | |
| bull exported | |
| Performance data | |||||
| Birth weight (kg) | Weight at age of 120 days (kg) | Weight at age of 210 days (kg) | Weight at age of 365 days (kg) | Weight - date of selection (kg) | |
| 40 | 195 | 310 | 482 | 0 | |
| Daily weight gain at test period (g) | Daily weight gain at test period (EBV) | Daily weight gain since birth (g) | Height at rump at age of 365 days (cm) | Height at rump - date of selection (cm) | |
| 0 | 110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Test station: | Date of selection: | ||||
| Linear scoring | ||||||||||
| Conformation | Body capacity | Muscularity | Breeding type | Total | ||||||
| HG | LB | WT | WCH | DCH | LP | MS | MT | MR | ||
| 7 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 10 | 7 | 74 |
| Relative breeding value: 103 | Relative breeding value: 111 | Relative breeding value: 115 | Relative breeding value: 116 | |||||||
Explanations:
HG - height, LB - length of body, WT - weight, WCH - width of chest, DCH - depth of chest, LP - lenght of pelvis, MS - muscle of shoulder, MT - muscle of top line, MR - muscle of rump
Graphs explanations:
HG - height, LB - length of body, WT - weight, CO - conformation, BC - body capacity, MU - muscularity, BC - breeding type
HG - height, LB - length of body, WT - weight, WCH - width of chest, DCH - depth of chest, LP - lenght of pelvis, MS - muscle of shoulder, MT - muscle of top line, MR - muscle of rump
Graphs explanations:
HG - height, LB - length of body, WT - weight, CO - conformation, BC - body capacity, MU - muscularity, BC - breeding type
Linear scoring - EBV
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
99
HG
109
LB
100
WT
103
CO
111
BC
115
MU
116
BT
| Breeding values | |||||
| Direct effect accuracy | Maternal effect accuracy | Calculation date: | 31.03.2024 | ||
| Calves: | 44 | ||||
| Calving ease | Growth | Calving ease | Growth | Herds: | 1 |
| 109/65 | 111/75 | 100/24 | 97/22 | Calves weighted: | 15 |
| Calved daughters: | 0 | ||||
Direct effect - EBV
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
112
Calv. ease
105
Birth weight
109
SI CAE
115
120 days
111
210 days
107
365 days
111
SI GR
Direct/Maternal effect explanation:
SI CAE - Selection Index - calving traits; SI GR - Selection Index - growth SI CAE definition: (relEBV CAE + relEBV BWT) / 2 SI GR definition: (relEBV 120 + relEBV 210 + relEBV 365) / 3
SI CAE - Selection Index - calving traits; SI GR - Selection Index - growth SI CAE definition: (relEBV CAE + relEBV BWT) / 2 SI GR definition: (relEBV 120 + relEBV 210 + relEBV 365) / 3
Maternal effect - EBV
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
96
Calv. ease
104
Birth weight
100
SI CAE
97
120 days
97
210 days
98
365 days
97
SI GR
Population average comparison :
| ZBM 218 | Average | Difference | |
| Direct effect - calving ease | 109 | 109 | 0 |
| Direct effect - growth | 111 | 102 | +9 |
| Maternal effect - calving ease | 100 | 115 | -15 |
| Maternal effect - growth | 97 | 124 | -27 |
| Pedigree |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards achieved at exhibitions
(sorry, Czech language only)
10/2003
4. Národní výstava Letňany 2003
2. misto telata
|
If you are not familiar with Czech selection/performance system, we recommend to read Selection system article first.
Detailed information of Czech methodology can be downloaded in here. Data of owners are taken from the central evidence of CMSCH, a.s. This is therefore the name of the holding to which the bull was moved within the central evidence. |