Bull details |
|
| Basic information | |||
| Name |
|
||
| KODAK ET | |||
| Breed | Ear-tag No. | ||
| Belgian Blue | 121388585 CZ | ||
| State register | Herd-Book No. | ||
| ZBM 211 | 313585121388 | ||
| Country of origin | Birth date | ||
| Czechia | 26.05.2002 | ||
| DNA | Blood | ||
| IDNA 007/03 | I 0007/03 | ||
| Breeder | Owner |
| Lagros s.r.o.Teplice n/M. | |
| Statut | |
| bull not alive | |
| Performance data | |||||
| Birth weight (kg) | Weight at age of 120 days (kg) | Weight at age of 210 days (kg) | Weight at age of 365 days (kg) | Weight - date of selection (kg) | |
| 40 | 160 | 255 | 417 | 0 | |
| Daily weight gain at test period (g) | Daily weight gain at test period (EBV) | Daily weight gain since birth (g) | Height at rump at age of 365 days (cm) | Height at rump - date of selection (cm) | |
| 0 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Test station: | Date of selection: | ||||
| Linear scoring | ||||||||||
| Conformation | Body capacity | Muscularity | Breeding type | Total | ||||||
| HG | LB | WT | WCH | DCH | LP | MS | MT | MR | ||
| 6 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 58 |
| Relative breeding value: 84 | Relative breeding value: 92 | Relative breeding value: 99 | Relative breeding value: 94 | |||||||
Explanations:
HG - height, LB - length of body, WT - weight, WCH - width of chest, DCH - depth of chest, LP - lenght of pelvis, MS - muscle of shoulder, MT - muscle of top line, MR - muscle of rump
Graphs explanations:
HG - height, LB - length of body, WT - weight, CO - conformation, BC - body capacity, MU - muscularity, BC - breeding type
HG - height, LB - length of body, WT - weight, WCH - width of chest, DCH - depth of chest, LP - lenght of pelvis, MS - muscle of shoulder, MT - muscle of top line, MR - muscle of rump
Graphs explanations:
HG - height, LB - length of body, WT - weight, CO - conformation, BC - body capacity, MU - muscularity, BC - breeding type
Linear scoring - EBV
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
85
HG
87
LB
79
WT
84
CO
92
BC
99
MU
94
BT
| Breeding values | |||||
| Direct effect accuracy | Maternal effect accuracy | Calculation date: | 31.03.2024 | ||
| Calves: | 15 | ||||
| Calving ease | Growth | Calving ease | Growth | Herds: | 1 |
| 110/36 | 102/53 | 84/14 | 82/15 | Calves weighted: | 0 |
| Calved daughters: | 0 | ||||
Direct effect - EBV
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
111
Calv. ease
109
Birth weight
110
SI CAE
100
120 days
102
210 days
104
365 days
102
SI GR
Direct/Maternal effect explanation:
SI CAE - Selection Index - calving traits; SI GR - Selection Index - growth SI CAE definition: (relEBV CAE + relEBV BWT) / 2 SI GR definition: (relEBV 120 + relEBV 210 + relEBV 365) / 3
SI CAE - Selection Index - calving traits; SI GR - Selection Index - growth SI CAE definition: (relEBV CAE + relEBV BWT) / 2 SI GR definition: (relEBV 120 + relEBV 210 + relEBV 365) / 3
Maternal effect - EBV
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
77
Calv. ease
91
Birth weight
84
SI CAE
85
120 days
83
210 days
78
365 days
82
SI GR
Population average comparison :
| ZBM 211 | Average | Difference | |
| Direct effect - calving ease | 110 | 109 | +1 |
| Direct effect - growth | 102 | 102 | 0 |
| Maternal effect - calving ease | 84 | 115 | -31 |
| Maternal effect - growth | 82 | 124 | -42 |
| Pedigree |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you are not familiar with Czech selection/performance system, we recommend to read Selection system article first.
Detailed information of Czech methodology can be downloaded in here. Data of owners are taken from the central evidence of CMSCH, a.s. This is therefore the name of the holding to which the bull was moved within the central evidence. |